A new study has established that sharptooth catfish found in the Klip River which feeds into the Vaal River, South Africa’s second largest river, contains banned pesticides which can cause cancer when consumed by humans.
The river runs through high density residential areas, including Soweto, Lenasia and Fleurhof in the south of Johannesburg. Some residents supplement their diet by fishing the popular catfish in the rivers as well as dams fed by them.
This is according to an article published on 22 October 2018 in “The Conversation”, an online publication which is funded by the National Research Foundation, eight universities, including the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Rhodes University, Stellenbosch University and the Universities of Cape Town, Johannesburg, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pretoria, and South Africa. It is hosted by the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Western Cape, the African Population and Health Research Centre and the Nigerian Academy of Science. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Strategic Partner.
The Conversation Africa’s Nontobeko Mtshali asked Rialet Pieters, Associate Professor in the Unit of Environmental Sciences and Management at the North West University to explain the implications of these findings.
What are these banned pesticides?
The pesticides we looked at are collectively known as organochlorine pesticides. They are used in agriculture to control insects that eat crops.
We did a human health risk assessment on the sharptooth catfish found in Orlando Dam and the Fleurhof and Lenasia areas in the south of Johannesburg. We chose this fish because it’s popular and widely consumed. The pesticides we targeted in the sharptooth catfish were lindane, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin and dichloro-diphenyl-trichloro-ethane (DDT). We found levels of heptachlor, DDT, and lindane in the fish.
All of the pesticides except for one, DDT, which is used against malaria-carrying mosquitoes, are banned in South Africa. So they should not be in the river. It’s not clear how they ended up in the Soweto, Fleurhof and Lenasia areas, though they could have made their way down the river from malaria-prone rural areas of the country.
The pesticides, with the exception of DDT, were banned by the international community under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants because of their harmful effects on the health of humans and wildlife. South Africa is a signatory to the convention and is obliged to reduce and eliminate the use of all the compounds listed in the convention.
The DDT presence is unusual in an urban area because it’s mostly used in more rural settings to control mosquitoes and the spread of malaria.
How bad are the pollution levels in the river that runs through Soweto, Fleurhof and Lenasia?
We found the pesticides were present in fish tissue that we tested. DDT was the most prevalent at all the sites. The concentrations of the pesticides were at levels much higher than internationally accepted parameters. This suggests the fish pose a risk to human health because the compounds bio-accumulate in the fish and when people eat them they can potentially cause cancer.
There is evidence that the banned pesticides, as well as DDT, can cause a host of cancers such as lung, skin, bladder, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, to name but a few.
We did a human health risk assessment using the concentrations of the pollutants in the fish to predict their effects in humans when consumed regularly. We collected 30 sharptooth catfish (one of several species of fish in the river) and determined the concentrations of DDT in the fillet.
We then calculated the chances of developing cancer for a human weighing 60 kg and eating 30 g of the contaminated fish every day. We followed the internationally standardised calculations and values for predicting human cancer risk. To account for the varying levels of pesticides in fish, cancer risk was calculated for the mid-range and high range pollutant level.
The probable cancer risk to DDT exposure varied between the three sites. The probability of developing cancer from eating the fish contaminated by DDT from Lenasia was the highest. We found that 251 out of 10 000 people may develop cancer if exposed to the mid-range level of the pesticide and 1 105 out of 10 000 people may develop cancer from the high range. At Fleurhof the risk ranged from 172 to 359 in 10 000 and at Orlando Dam from 191 to 624 in 10 000 people.
According to the US Environment Protection Agency, any risk greater than 1 in 10 000 is deemed an “unacceptable risk”.
We did not calculate the total cancer risk potentially posed by all the compounds together. Our focus was on DDT because of the high concentrations we found.
What should be done to fix the problem?
People who regularly eat or buy fish from the contaminated water need to be made aware of the risks to their health. One way of doing so is to have notice boards that advise on the safe consumption levels of the different species.
Fish from these areas need to be monitored regularly. And the sale of pesticides needs to be regulated better to ensure that the banned ones aren’t being traded.
* Nico Wolmarans also contributed to this article.
AND HERE IS RAND WATER’S RESPONSE (received on 29 October 2018)
The Klip River feeds into the Vaal River. The drinking water for Gauteng, as supplied by Rand Water, is abstracted from the Vaal Dam. The Vaal Dam is located upstream of both the Klip River and Vaal River that are mentioned in the article.
Rand Water continuously conducts intensive routine monitoring for all determinands as required by the South African National Drinking Water Standard – SANS241. Analyses are conducted on both the source water and the drinking water supplied to our customers.
Additionally, Rand Water tests for other contaminants (not part of SANS 241) biannually in source and treated water in the interest of public health protection. These contaminants include pesticides (including Aldrin, Dieldrin, Andrin, Lindane, Heptachlor and DDT which are mentioned in the article) and industrial chemicals.
These specific pesticides have not been detected in any of our source and treated waters. Our results indicate that the drinking water complies to SANS241 and the World Health Organisation guideline limits, as well as other international standards for drinking water.
The results are made available to all Rand Water’s customers and the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) and are published in Rand Water’s Annual Report, therefore, the tap water supplied by Rand Water in Gauteng is safe to drink.
* (Rand Water media release issued by Justice Mohale, Media Relations Manager: Rand Water).
Follow the link below for more news from The Conversation: